     x | Tuesday, January 18, 2000 - 08:33 pm 
Century ago, the meaning of Truth is the strictest... The rule was fine... The purposes or circumstances under which one can do is narrow...(except as taught in one ancient religious tradition).
So, if people lie, show dishonesty, mislead, act up, hide or whatever ....we should take it easy...as long as there is no damage..material or to the feelings. Afterall something is true, great. If its false, then its true after an infinite amount of time. Same thing, if someone misleads that he is Mr. Hero on his Date, well he is true, if not..then he is Mr. Hero asymptotically.
So the key words: "tends to", "relative to", "compared to" etc. After all, the dimension of Time itself is not absolute (its relative, man only measured difference between times always). And if time moves forward, things do change. That is: For a given absurd theory to be digested and accepted as valid we just need some large value of T (time).
Definition of Truth: It is that which was valid, is valid and will be valid in the future.... THE KEY is...we are referring to some value (truth) and tieing it up with our fourth dimension, time.
IN a relationship, if one lied, cheated, misled etc...then its illogical to take the absolute count of them. Whats logical is: to take the relative count. How many times did the guy lied minus the times girl cheated ? How many times the girl cheated minus the guy cheated ?
I always wonder why man tries to be absolute instead of live satisfactorily with relative values. Wake up man, you are moving too fast... but hey, your movements are relative to those of The Earth. |
