BayHouse
BayHouse Home BayHouse FAQ BayHouse Services

Forum   Topics   Tree View   Keyword Search
Credit Forum    CreditCourt Forum   2003 Credit Suit   CreditFactors   Order Credit Reports



Class action lawsuit against the Big 3 Bureaus

BayHouse Credit Forum: 10/1999 to 01/2001: Credit Reporting, FICO Credit Scoring, Disputes, Collections, Charge-offs, Bankruptcy, CCCS: Uncategorized Archive 2: Class action lawsuit against the Big 3 Bureaus
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

kristy welsh - creditinfocenter.com

Sunday, March 26, 2000 - 11:41 pm Click here to edit this post
I just received this letter and thought I should pass it along. More details are posted on my site.

Dear Kristy: I thought you'd like to know that I just filed a lawsuit in Superior Court in Washington against the Big 3 credit reporting agencies. The suit is on behalf of a couple who were denied credit based on credit card accounts on which they were only authorized users, not cardmembers. It is seeking compensatory and punitive damages for willful violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Slander of Credit. If you learn of any other consumers in the same situation, please have them contact me. Thanks.

R. Stuart Phillips

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

Bucky

Monday, March 27, 2000 - 01:05 pm Click here to edit this post
Kristy-

Can you elaborate? What is "Slander of Credit"? Is that a law one can possibly be using as a charge against a CRA for mistakes not corrected on the reports?

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

kristy welsh - creditinfocenter.com

Tuesday, March 28, 2000 - 09:23 am Click here to edit this post
Yes, that's exacty what it means. Here's a copy of the whole complaint....

http://www.lawyerphillips.com/Phillips%20v.%20Trans%20Union%20et%20al%20--%20Complaint.htm

Kristy

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

Steven Z

Thursday, March 30, 2000 - 11:41 pm Click here to edit this post
I am all in favor of a lawsuit, especially a class action lawsuit against the crooked and morally bankrupt CRA's and while I see a clear possibility of winning for the first part, in my opinion, there is little chance for the second.

That is, the crooks, pardon defendants, will lay total blame and responsibility on the doorstep the bank, First USA, for fradulant and illegaly placing the plaintiff in the position and responsility of co-holder rather than the fact of his being just an authorized user. Something the banks attempt to "get away with" any chance they have.

Though their words will be to the affect "take it up with First USA we just report what information is sent to us". Thats for certain the CRA's will report any info no matter how fradulent or phony as long as their paid their fee. FCRA be damned.

In any case, plaintiffs better be prepared to take this all the way to the Supreme Court because the CRA's will contest it and appeal any ruling every step of the way.


Add a Message


This is a private posting area. A valid username and password combination is required to post messages to this discussion.
Username:  
Password:



Topics     Tree View     Keyword Search     Program Credits   Administration

Credit Forum    CreditCourt Forum   2003 Credit Suit   CreditFactors   Order Credit Reports