BayHouse
BayHouse Home BayHouse FAQ BayHouse Services

Forum   Topics   Tree View   Keyword Search
Credit Forum    CreditCourt Forum   2003 Credit Suit   CreditFactors   Order Credit Reports



New Law on Inquiries.

BayHouse Credit Forum: 10/1999 to 01/2001: Credit Reporting, FICO Credit Scoring, Disputes, Collections, Charge-offs, Bankruptcy, CCCS: Uncategorized Archive 4: New Law on Inquiries.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

TIM (Tim)

Friday, June 09, 2000 - 02:40 pm Click here to edit this post
About three to four weeks ago the FCRA passed a new law. It states that the CRA can only keep inquiries on your report for one year. Check your report everyone and if their over a year old file
a dispute. Remember inquiries lower your FICO.

Also you may not know that if you are not granted credit by a creditor who made a inquirie, by the FCRA laws they must remove it. It's not easy to do all three of the CRA don't comply but if you push the issue you can get it removed.

Good Luck!!

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

Scott (Scott)

Friday, June 09, 2000 - 03:40 pm Click here to edit this post
The FCRA is a Law itself, not a governmental body. The Congress passes laws, which are signed by the president. State assemblies also pass laws, which are then signed by the state's Governor. Can you get is a link to this somewhere on a .gov website?

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

Christine Baker (Admin)

Friday, June 09, 2000 - 09:30 pm Click here to edit this post
Yeah, I'd like to see that *new* FCRA link too. I think we would have heard about it if it existed.

For Credit Scoring the inquiries are only counted for the 12 preceding months anyway.

On RMCRs we only list inquiries in the preceding 3 months.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

TIM (Tim)

Saturday, June 10, 2000 - 11:09 am Click here to edit this post
Yes, I know how laws are made. Boy their are some
pretty bright people here. Christine the expert you think you are, you should keep up with this stuff! Here it is FCRA 609.3 II. Go to findlaw.com
Christine and read it yourself. It's not a link.
Is that how you get all your expert advice from links someone tells you about. Try doing your own research, maybe some of the advice you give would be correct and just maybe help someone. That is what your trying to do here isn't it???
Like I said on my other message I won't post or reply here again, you people are just way to smart for me!

Good Luck to All!!!

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

Christine Baker (Admin)

Saturday, June 10, 2000 - 03:13 pm Click here to edit this post
Tim, I don't go to .com's to get the law, I go to .gov's.

And here's what's in the FCRA published at http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fcra.htm#609

"§ 609. Disclosures to consumers [15 U.S.C. § 1681g]

(a) Information on file; sources; report recipients. Every consumer reporting agency shall, upon request, and subject to 610(a)(1) [§ 1681h], clearly and accurately disclose to the consumer:

(1) ...

(2) ....

(3) (A) Identification of each person (including each end-user identified under section 607(e)(1) [§ 1681e]) that procured a consumer report

(i) for employment purposes, during the 2-year period preceding the date on which the request is made; or

(ii) for any other purpose, during the 1-year period preceding the date on which the request is made."

I don't get it, I see nothing new.

Makes me wonder if Tim isn't with a CRA on a mission to spread misinformation and to disrupt INTELLIGENT discussions.

I see nothing in §609 that has ANYTHING to do with the maximum time inquiries are listed.

The entire §609 is about CONSUMER DISCLOSURES: "§ 609. Disclosures to consumers [15 U.S.C. § 1681g]"

Tim once again makes it so clear how important it is to understand what you read. It takes a certain skill, it sure isn't easy.

There is nothing more dangerous than thinking that you know something when you're really clueless.

And as I mentioned several times lately, don't believe anything that's not documented. Let's continue to quote from the law or whatever source and combined with experiences we'll figure things out.


Add a Message


This is a private posting area. A valid username and password combination is required to post messages to this discussion.
Username:  
Password:



Topics     Tree View     Keyword Search     Program Credits   Administration

Credit Forum    CreditCourt Forum   2003 Credit Suit   CreditFactors   Order Credit Reports